Aktuelle InSights

By: Andy Klose and Jalol Khodjaev

In the competitive landscape of consulting firms, attracting and retaining top talent is crucial. Vencon Research has recognized the need for strategic guidance in compensation management and has introduced Pay Recommendations, an innovative enhancement to our compensation benchmark reports for the consulting industry. This solution is designed for both consultants and partners and has the potential to revolutionise how consulting companies approach their compensation strategies.

Tailored Solutions for Consulting Firms

At the heart of our Pay Recommendations lies a deep understanding of the unique needs of consulting firms, particularly for client-facing career levels below Partners and above. These recommendations are not one-size-fits-all; rather, they are bespoke reports crafted based on the Consultant Salary Reports or Partner Compensation Reports delivered to clients. Taking into account the specific local and service line dynamics of each client’s company, our reports provide a comprehensive evaluation of various compensation elements, including Total Cash Compensation, Basic Salary, Target Bonus, and Allowances.

Strategic Insights for Optimal Compensation Strategies

Vencon Research provides strategic insights into career progression and budget implications, in addition to numerical analysis. We align compensation elements with the client's desired market positioning to ensure adherence to the firm's pay philosophy while maintaining market competitiveness. Our aim is to facilitate gradual increases aligned with market percentiles, fostering employee rewards and career development in tandem.

Actionable Recommendations for Sustainable Growth

The true value of our Pay Recommendations lies in their actionable nature. With detailed suggestions for appropriate changes in each relevant compensation element, tailored to the client's positioning target, pay philosophy, and other metrics, our reports empower consulting firms to make informed decisions. By providing insights into the expected budget impact and assessing staff distribution across career levels, we enable strategic workforce planning and optimization of resources.

Illustrative Graphics and Comparative Analysis

Illustrative graphics within our reports vividly demonstrate the gap between current pay structures and market percentiles, highlighting areas for improvement. Through comparative analysis, we offer a holistic view of the client’s situation, enabling them to benchmark their compensation practices against industry standards. Moreover, our unique feature comparing career progression provides a time-based perspective on firm attractiveness for career development opportunities.

Guidance and Insights

Our Pay Recommendations provide clear and concise guidance on compensation elements, ensuring ease of implementation. We offer simulations of expected budget impacts and comparisons of staff distribution across levels, providing valuable insights into competitive positioning. Vencon Research provides data-driven recommendations and strategic guidance to empower consulting companies to optimize their compensation strategies for sustainable growth.

Empowering Consulting Firms for Success

In conclusion, Vencon Research's Pay Recommendations signify a significant change in how consulting firms approach compensation management. Our Pay Recommendations provide actionable insights, specific pay suggestions, and strategic guidance, empowering our clients to attract and retain top talent while maintaining competitiveness in the market. As the consulting landscape continues to evolve, our commitment to unlocking strategic insights remains unwavering. With Vencon Research as your partner, you can embark on a journey towards success, driven by informed decision-making and strategic vision.

A video overview of the Pay Recommendations report is available here.

We are at your disposal for further questions and suggestions regarding how you optimally design pay ranges and/or remuneration systems for your company.

Book your introduction meeting online here.

Andy Klose is an Associate Partner at Vencon Research International and heads the firm’s consulting unit.

Jalol Khodjaev is a Senior Consultant at Vencon Research International’s consulting unit.

Vencon Research International is a leading provider of compensation benchmarking and research as well as of compensation and performance-related consulting services for professional service firms, especially for audit and tax, management consulting, and IT services firms. Vencon Research International provides services to a full range of clients in more than 75 countries worldwide and is proud to name more than 85% of the world’s major consulting and/or professional services firm its clients.

‍

By:
‍Hilmar Albers – Partner
Erwin Harbauer - Managing Partner

In parallel to the positive momentum witnessed in the country’s economic growth, forecasts indicate that Japan is expected to experience a long-awaited boost in wages. However, Japanese consultants can only look forward to a marginal offsetting of the cost of living pressures experienced in the country.

Domestic demand is a major driver of the Japanese economy. Unfortunately, consumer demand had subdued after a decade of ‘Abenomics’ with only disappointing growth in workers’ earnings, compounded by record inflation during QIV of 2022 and culminating in a 41-year-high rate of inflation of 4.3%¹ in January 2023.

While Japanese inflation remains relatively modest compared to the US or the Eurozone, these levels represent a radical shift for an economy that has experienced decades of ultra-low inflation.

Now, despite famously stagnant salaries, Japanese industry has reacted and wage increases are finally on the cards across all sectors. Open source market analyses predict an average hike in salaries of 2.8% (with estimates ranging from 2.5% to 3.4%)².

When also taking the re-opening of the country's borders to foreign visitors since October 2022 into account, we expect such wage increases to spur domestic demand and further stimulate economic activity. We therefore believe that the outlook for the remainder of 2023 is relatively positive for the Japanese economy.

Furthermore, Vencon Research’s survey data shows that the consulting industry is not excluded here and many of our clients have signalled growing order books. However, although consulting firms are also increasing salaries, the expected increases are far from those being offered by the country’s other industries, and average only 1.4%³ across career levels.

Many firms have also planned different levels of increases across their career grades, with a greater concentration on the lower career levels and less relative growth being offered to the more senior Management and Principal levels.

Since consultants already count as high-earners in Japan (as well as in most other countries worldwide), the lower expected salary growth percentages may be less surprising.

On the whole, while the consulting sector itself can hope to profit from a general uptick in economic conditions, Japanese consultants can only look forward to a marginal offsetting of the cost of living pressures experienced by the country.

For more information on this topic or on how you may successfully respond to the issues raised in this article, please contact Vencon Research – as always, we are happy to assist you.

‍

_{[1] https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/inflation-cpi;}

_{[2] Various inflation forecasting and research firms, incl. Japan Economic Research Center, Kienbaum, Korn Ferry Hay Group, Willis Towers Watson}

_{[3] Vencon Research analysis; Client feedback}

_‍

‍

‍

By: Irina Kvirikadze – Senior Manager Data Integrity

The gender pay gap, i.e. the disparity in pay between people of different genders, rightly counts among the leading topics in today’s business world, even more so in Western European countries. In this context, the consulting industry is usually expected to be at the forefront of efforts to ensure greater equality. But what does the data actually say?

In this article we take a closer look at the consulting industry in Western Europe, and explore the issues with and implications of gender-based pay in more detail.

What the data says

According to Eurostat[1], gender pay equity in European countries varies significantly. When examining some of the major Western European countries, the unadjusted pay gap level in France is over 15%, in Germany almost 18%, and in Italy only 5%. According to the government’s 2022 Equality Act publication[2], in the United Kingdom the median pay gap is close to 10%. According to the same report, the gap is much higher in the private sector (which would include the consulting industry).

Overall, the consulting industry is notable for its high salaries and competitive work environment. Moreover, consulting firms working in North American and in Western European countries are often regarded as leading advocates for gender equality and greater diversity. Most of these firms have already implemented numerous initiatives in favour of equal pay across the industry[3].

Nevertheless, according to Vencon Research survey data, which includes both the largest full-service firms across Europe, as well as Europe’s significant boutique firms, women with the same level of education, experience or responsibilities, continue to face salary pay gaps when compared to their male counterparts. Furthermore, there are notable differences between countries in terms of the prevalence of a gender-based pay gap. For instance (as shown in table 1 below) France shows a pay-gap of 18%, the UK of 23% and Germany of 27%. Italy shows the smallest gap of the four countries but remains significant at 9%.

Furthermore, pay gap inequalities appear to be even more significant when comparing the managerial levels and less prominent at non-managerial positions, meaning, as one moves up the consulting career path, the pay gap begins to widen.

In France, for example (as shown in table 2 below), the pay gap at non-managerial levels is 5%, whereas at higher rank positions it is 30%. A similar situation can be found in other countries too, with the UK showing a pay-gap of 12% at non-managerial levels and 33% at higher rank positions, and Germany having the highest pay gap discrepancy at non-managerial as well as at senior consulting levels, 14% and 39% respectively.

Italy again has the lowest pay gap out of the four countries, in managerial positions men earn more than women by 23%. In non-managerial positions however, it seems women earn more than their male counterparts. This ‘negative’ pay gap may be driven by the fact that we have found that women in consulting in Italy tend to have a longer tenure in non-senior roles than their male counterparts.

What are some of the drivers of this issue?

There have been a number of studies that examine underlying factors that contribute to the gender pay gap. As previously mentioned, one reason may be that despite the introduction of antidiscrimination policies, gender biases may still be ‘unconsciously’ applied, meaning women may be overlooked for leadership roles, remaining relegated to lower ranking positions and thus do not have the same access to the more lucrative senior roles with better advancement opportunities.  

Male versus female representation at senior career levels

Vencon Research’s survey data seems to support the notion that women may be staying longer in certain positions. In fact, male consultants typically reach partner level faster than their female counterparts, who tend to take more time off due to family related reasons and may return to work as part-time employees[4]. This, on the other hand, decelerates their promotion to management levels and may also negatively impact their earning capability.

As shown in table 3 below, the number of female professionals in all four countries in this comparison starts to decrease as one moves to the more senior or managerial levels. This on the other hand, highlights the fact that a significant gender imbalance at the higher-ranking positions remains and that female consultants at senior levels are still underrepresented.

Addressing this issue is also essential as studies show that diverse teams achieve greater success[5].  Moreover, in comparison to their male colleagues at the same level, female leaders seem to achieve a greater level of “employee well-being”, which in turn increases retention rates and employee satisfaction[6].

What can consulting firms do to address the gender pay gap?

There are several steps consulting firms can implement in order to narrow or ideally close the gender pay gap in particular at managerial levels.

The first step is to regularly audit and identify within the firm any pay disparities between male and female colleagues. This will help to ensure fair pay as well as increase transparency around salaries.

In order to support women to balance work and family responsibilities, companies can implement more flexible work arrangements such as flexible schedules, instead of a clock-in-clock-out system and offer remote work options[7]. This can help retain talented female employees and on the other hand, ensure that they are not penalised for taking time off for family related reasons.

Furthermore, it is clear that this complex issue requires a multifaceted approach not only from businesses, but society as a whole. However, firms can and should do more to address gender-based unconscious biases in the workplace, through training and educational programmes, raise awareness and promote a more inclusive work culture. Being pro-active in this matter will help managers recognise and correct their own biases and allow them to make promotion or hiring decisions that do not overlook women for leadership positions. It will also help to increase the number of female consultants at managerial positions and thus reduce the gender-based representation disbalance.

Concluding thoughts

Management consulting firms in Western European countries are at the forefront of efforts to promote gender equality measures, however, they still face significant problems in closing the gender pay gap. There are notable differences among countries, but the general trend is the same, at the non-managerial positions pay disparity between men and women is narrower (or even negative) and female consultants are more represented, while at managerial positions the salary gap is significantly wider and women remain underrepresented.

In conclusion, much work remains to be done to ensure that women are paid fairly and equitably and that they are not only relegated to lower ranking positions. By continuing to implement equal-pay initiatives, such as pay audits, flexible or remote work arrangements and unconscious bias training, consulting companies can help close gender pay disparities, balance gender representation at managerial levels and create a more inclusive work place for all employees.  

‍

Sources:

[1]https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Gender_pay_gap_statistics#Gender_pay_gap_levels_vary_significantly_across_EU

[2]https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dit-gender-pay-gap-report-and-data-2021-to-2022

[3]https://www.ft.com/content/c8118e14-143e-11e9-a168-d45595ad076d

[4]https://managementconsulted.com/gender-pay-gap-consulting/

[5]https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/diversity/managing-multicultural-teams

[6]https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace

[7]https://consultport.com/for-consultants/how-do-we-get-more-women-into-consulting/

‍

By Miklos Bodnar - Business Development Senior Manager

Internal consulting practices (ICPs) have become a more common feature of the global consulting and professional services sector and present their own set of challenges and opportunities for Human Resources leaders at traditional consulting firms as they compete with ICPs for talent acquisition.

Internal Consulting Practices (ICPs)

An internal consulting practice is an in-house group established by an existing firm to provide support and assistance with making critical strategy and operational decisions. The primary impetus in creating such practices is to reduce the reliance on traditional, external consulting firms, such as McKinsey, Bain, BCG, Kearney, Big 4, Accenture, etc., as well as associated costs, while also hoping to increase the efficiency and availability of consulting services. The advantages of an in-house consulting group include a more comprehensive understanding of a firm's structure, greater availability and responsiveness for problem-solving, involvement in both strategy and implementation, and greater alignment with the client.

Some examples of major firms with internal consulting practices are: Airbus, AMEX, Disney, Google, Siemens, Ford, General Motors.

How should human resource leaders anticipate and prepare for competition with ICPs?

The most obvious challenge presented to HR leaders at traditional consulting firms is the competition for top level consulting talent, especially in a recruitment market that is already under external pressures from non-consulting industries.

While ICPs do expand the number of competitors for talent, traditional consulting companies still generally hold an advantage in many areas of employment attractiveness, and should play to these strengths. Some key factors to consider are:

ICPs may offer different/less advantageous career advancement: ICPs can be limited in their ability to expand their service offering and client base, thus capping the needed for increased staffing and partners. This inherently smaller structure could constrain career advancement and thus attractiveness.

Opportunity for travel (when desirable): As ICPs are most likely co-located with the parent firm and primarily work only for the single “client” on-site, no additional travel outside of the consultant’s primary home base is required. While some may appreciate not having to travel, there are also consultants who consider frequent travel opportunities to be an advantage associated with the sector.

ICPs may offer less exposure to different industries and projects: Consulting with an ICP may provide an extremely focused work environment, where the consultant-client interaction is far more comprehensive and the consultant has access to the parent company on a daily basis. However, this very focus can also lead to a lack of variety in the consulting work carried out. And while specialization may be a key driver in a consultant’s career, this in turn may be limited, as the consulting opportunities and problem solving will only be within the parent company’s specific industry and business focus.

Open market opportunities could be less “competitive” as a consultant has only worked for a specific client and industry: The potential limitations outlined above also play out for candidates who may consider how to maximise their future employability. A lack of exposure to different industries and types of consulting work could diminish their competitiveness vis-à-vis peers who have experience at traditional consulting firms.

The case for ICPs

As businesses become more complex and competitive, there is a growing need for customized and specialized consulting solutions that internal consulting teams are well-positioned to deliver. Working for an ICP can offer consultants greater job security, the opportunity to build long-term relationships with stakeholders, and the ability to make a more significant impact on the organization. Internal consulting practices may also be perceived to offer more work-life balance and a more predictable schedule compared to traditional consulting companies, making them an attractive option for consultants looking for a more stable career path.

‍

What can Vencon Research do for you?

Vencon Research has recognized the growing and impactful presence of Internal Consulting Practices in the larger consulting industry and has integrated these firms into our compensation benchmarking analysis and services. Should your firm require assistance identifying the appropriate strategies to ensure your own rewards and recruitment attraction fully takes this aspect of the consulting market into account, we are available to provide you with the solutions to succeed.

‍

By Cara Solorzano

Our latest article addresses professionals and decision-makers in the consulting industry involved in shaping the global expansion strategy of their firms. It delves into Location Responsibility models—Local, Regional, or Global and offers insights into strategic planning, effective management, and balancing global consistency with local nuances.

The Global Landscape of the Consulting Industry

In an era marked by rapid technological advancements, evolving business landscapes, and an increasing demand for specialized expertise, the consulting industry has witnessed a remarkable global expansion. The traditional role of consultants as problem solvers has transcended geographical boundaries, and consulting firms now find themselves navigating the complexities of a world interconnected by digital networks and international markets.

The Location Responsibility Dilemma: Local, Regional, or Global?

As consulting firms strive to navigate this dynamic landscape, the crucial question emerges: What Location Responsibility model best serves your firm's vision - Local, Regional, or Global?

Regionalizing Offices for Global Competitiveness

Many consulting firms that have a significant global presence organize their country markets by regions, such as APAC (Asia Pacific), or LATAM (Latin America). Regionalizing offices empowers consulting firms to navigate the intricacies of diverse markets, respond rapidly to client needs, and leverage local talent, ultimately strengthening their overall competitiveness in the global consulting arena.

Strategic Planning for Successful Regional Expansion

While regionalizing offices has its advantages, consulting firms must carefully weigh these against the potential downsides, such as increased operational complexity, challenges in maintaining consistency, and any potential impacts on company culture and financial performance. Through Vencon Research’s years of data collection, we have observed that strategic planning and effective management are crucial factors in mitigating the aforementioned risks. Ensuring successful regional expansion can be resolved by assigning one country market to be responsible for the entire global standardization and operations of company acculturation.

Centralized Global Oversight: Enhancing Consistency and Collaboration

Global oversight of consulting firms, where a centralized management structure governs operations across various regions, presents several advantages.

Establishing Consistent Standards

One significant advantage is the ability to maintain consistent standards based on the philosophy of the company. With a centralized approach to oversight, consulting firms can establish and enforce standardized methodologies, best practices, and service quality benchmarks that apply uniformly across all offices worldwide.

Fostering Collaboration and Synergy

This consistency enhances the firm's reputation, instils client confidence, and fosters a sense of reliability in the delivery of consulting services. Centralized management enables efficient sharing of information, resources, and expertise across different regions. This interconnectivity allows for a more collaborative and synergetic approach to problem-solving, leveraging the diverse skills and perspectives available within the global consulting firm.

Drawbacks of Global Oversight

While a model predicated on global oversight provides uniformity in strategies and operations, this method of management also has some disadvantages.

Overlooking Local Nuances and Cultural Differences

One potentially significant drawback is the risk of overlooking the nuances inherent within local cultural differences. A centralized management structure may struggle to fully understand and address the unique challenges and business environments in specific regions. This lack of localized insight can result in strategies that are less effective or may not resonate well with clients in certain markets.

Communication Challenges and Team Detachment

Cultural and communication barriers may also arise in a globally overseen consulting firm. Effective communication becomes more challenging as the organization spans different languages, time zones, and cultural contexts. Furthermore, global oversight may lead to a sense of detachment among local teams. Employees in regional offices may feel less connected to the overarching vision and decision-making processes of the firm, potentially affecting morale, engagement, and retention.

Striking the Right Balance: Considerations for Success

While global firm oversight offers benefits in terms of consistency and efficiency, consulting firms must carefully consider and address the potential downsides, including the risk of overlooking local nuances, reduced agility, and communication challenges.

Balancing Global Oversight with Regional Specifics

Balancing global oversight with mechanisms to understand and address regional specifics is essential for success in a diverse and dynamic consulting industry. It ensures that your firm can adapt to local nuances while maintaining global consistency, fostering resilience in the face of evolving market dynamics. This equilibrium is the cornerstone of sustainable growth and competitiveness in the global consulting arena.

Tailored Collaboration for Success

Vencon Research is your collaborative partner in navigating the complexities of global expansion. Our bespoke recommendations are crafted with your unique needs in mind, ensuring local relevance and global consistency. Contact Vencon Research today to discover the ideal Location Responsibility model for your company's success in the global consulting arena.

‍

Key HR indicators for the consulting industry

This collection of market statistics briefs highlights key consulting market statistics across six countries in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region: Australia, China, India, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. It offers insights into various key factors, such as the highest paying lines of businesses, market growth, starting salaries, career progression, and market pay level.

Notable highlights across APAC countries

• The year-on-year market headcount increase across these six countries ranged from 5% to 10%, with “Energy, Environment,     Sustainability Consulting” and “Risk Advisory Services” lines of businesses witnessing the largest growth.
• The average time required to progress from analyst level to partner level ranged from 24 to 28.5 years, with China having the fastest track.
• “Strategy-Oriented Management Consulting” was one of the highest-paid lines of business.
• Japan had the highest bonuses (relative to fixed salary) across LOBs and levels (18% median and 43% maximum) and Australia the lowest (10% median and 28% maximum).

The sheets also present median salaries for all Vencon Research career levels as percentages of basic salaries paid in the United States. Out of the six countries presented here, consultants in Australia and Singapore were paid the highest, ranging from 50% to 75%, while those in India were paid the least, ranging from 13% to 38%.

‍