Dernières publications

By Jalol Khodjaev - Senior Consultant
and Osas Ohenhen - Associate Business Development

Key highlights

The global mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market slowed in 2022 with a 35% drop in transaction values. In this context a significant number of management consulting firms providing M&A services as well as pure M&A advisory firms (hereafter together referred to as "M&A consulting firms") experienced negative financial impacts.

Despite declining revenues, M&A consulting firms were cautious in making immediate adjustments to employee compensation. The surveyed firms made minimal to moderate changes to base pay, with variable pay adjustments fluctuating among firms, mostly due to differences in bonus structures. Adjustments to additional benefits (i.e. equity-related pay, allowances, pension plan, non-cash benefits) were minimal.

In 2023, M&A consulting firms may encounter difficulties in attaining well-balanced compensation for their workforce, as the market remains uncertain due to global recession fears and rising interest rates.

Less than half of the M&A consulting firms surveyed plan to raise base pay for employees, while the remaining firms have no intention to implement changes here.

Most firms will keep performance-based bonuses (Bonus 1) unchanged in 2023. About one-third of firms have no plans to change firm-based bonuses (Bonus 2), while the remaining firms appear uncertain about future actions regarding this bonus. Only few firms intend to increase Bonus 3, which derives from the M&A team’s bonus pool.

A majority of firms (over 70%) maintained existing allowances and pension plans, while a small percentage introduced equity-pay (less than 10%) and non-cash benefits (less than 20%) to their compensation plans.

Introduction

Global M&A activity declined in late 2022 due to economic and financing hurdles, such as inflation, higher interest rates, reduced leveraged finance, bond-market concerns, and the potential for a recession.

Vencon Research reached out to M&A consulting firms operating in Western and Central Europe to understand the impact of the economic and financial downturn on their businesses and, potentially, on their workforce and compensation.

In this article, we will explore the survey’s findings, gaining insights into the approaches M&A consulting firms employed to mitigate the repercussions of challenging market conditions on the workforce. 

Global M&A activities slowed substantially in the second half of 2022

The total value of M&A transactions globally fell 35% in 2022 from 2021’s record high, to USD 3,390 billion (refer to Graph 1.). That is the biggest year-over-year percentage drop since 2001, a year when the U.S. economy slid into a recession and the value of global transactions plunged approximately 50%, to USD 1, 866 billion.

The outlook for 2023 still remains clouded for global M&A business due to global recession fears and rising interest rates as national central banks try to curb the inflation in many regions. The estimated year-end transaction volume for 2023 is USD 2,153 billion, which would be 37% lower than the 2022 values.

Market conditions had varying impact on M&A

Vencon Research’s survey results showed that market conditions have had varying impact on the M&A business of M&A consulting firms. A significant number of firms (> 60%) experienced a slightly negative impact, while a small portion (<10%) reported a very negative impact. Interestingly, the firms involved in transactions ranging between €5 to €25 million and €25 to €100 million were the ones that experienced the highest proportion of negative impacts. Roughly a quarter of the firms reported experiencing insignificant impact.

The majority of participants witnessed a decline in the demand for their M&A services. Furthermore, nearly half of the firms reported a decrease in the number of M&A deals and transactions, while approximately one-third of the firms experienced a decline in their overall M&A revenue. None of the firms reported an increase in their M&A revenue.

Graph 1. Value and number of global M&A transactions [1]

M&A consulting firms cautious in adjusting workforce compensation

Retaining top-performers, ensuring financial well-being of employees, as well as maintaining attractiveness for young talent during such economic and financial turmoil was a pressing challenge for M&A consulting firms, as they were forced to make significant cuts in expenses to minimize the negative impact on the overall health of their businesses. Potentially this included adjustments to employee compensation. As such cuts could lead to growing resentment among employees and a high turnover rate, many M&A consulting firms were rather cautious and selective when making compensation adjustments. 

Adjustments to base pay (fixed salary)

Less than half of the M&A consulting firms surveyed implemented a moderate increase in base pay for their entry to mid-level employees[2], with only a small percentage (<10%) opting for significant raises at this level. At approximately one-third of the firms, senior employees[3] experienced a moderate rise in their base pay. None of the surveyed firms opted to reduce base pay.

However, a considerable number of M&A consulting firms (around 70%) chose not to make any changes to base pay for senior employees, whereas nearly half of the firms applied a similar approach with respect to base pay for entry to mid-level employees. It can be inferred that these firms viewed unstable financial and market conditions as a temporary phenomenon. Consequently, they approached base pay adjustments with caution, recognizing that once implemented, these changes may be challenging to reverse when the situation stabilizes and returns to its previous levels.

Adjustments to variable pay (bonuses)

The survey findings revealed that M&A consulting firms had diverse variable pay/bonus structures. Therefore the adjustments made to this compensation component varied.

For the purpose of this research and for effective comparison, we have defined three types of variable pay/bonus:

Bonus 1 (also known as personal or individual bonus): This refers to a financial reward granted to an individual employee based on personal performance or contribution to the firm. It is typically independent of a bonus pool and is not directly linked to the overall performance of the firm or a specific business area. Such bonuses are awarded based on the achievement of personal KPIs.

Bonus 2 (also known as firm-performance or firm-based bonus): This type of bonus is awarded to an individual employee based on the financial success of the firm. It may be determined by factors such as profitability, revenue growth, or the attainment of other firm-wide metrics. The award can be a portion of a bonus pool allocated to employees or a percentage of the firm’s EBIT or similar financial indicators. The distribution of this bonus category may consider factors such as job role, career level, and other relevant considerations.

Bonus 3: This bonus category involves a share of the overall bonus pool or a separate/dedicated bonus pool specifically allocated to the M&A team. The size of the bonus pool, allocation, or similar factors is typically determined by various criteria, including the successful completion of M&A transactions, meeting or exceeding performance metrics of the M&A team, achieving targets or KPIs, and other relevant indicators.

Note: In pure M&A advisory firms Bonus 2 (firm-based bonus) and Bonus 3 (bonus allocated from bonus pool) are not considered as separate, but rather refer to the same concept.

Among the M&A consulting firms surveyed, Bonus 1 was frequently granted to entry to mid-level employees, while Bonus 3 was more commonly provided to senior employees. A majority of the firms offered a combination of bonuses to their M&A teams. Approximately 40% of the firms provided all three bonus components (Bonus 1, Bonus 2, and Bonus 3) to their senior employees, whereas only a quarter of the firms afforded the same offerings to entry to mid-level employees. Around 40% of the firms offered a combination of two bonuses (Bonus 1+Bonus 2, Bonus 1+Bonus 3, Bonus 2+Bonus 3) to employees in both groups. The remaining surveyed firms offered either Bonus 1 (over 15% - exclusively for entry to mid-level employees), or Bonus 2 (less than 10% - exclusively for senior employees), or Bonus 3 (less than 10% - offered to both groups).

In terms of adjustments to Bonus 1, most M&A consulting firms (above 70%) made no changes, despite the challenging economic and financial conditions. Only some firms (20%) moderately decreased Bonus 1 for senior-level employees. The remaining few firms either made moderate increases to Bonus 1 or implemented significant reductions to it.

As for Bonus 2, approximately half of the M&A consulting firms implemented a moderate decrease for entry to mid-level employees, while around 40% of the firms did the same for senior-level employees. One-third of the firms chose not to make any changes to Bonus 2 for entry to mid-level employees, while around 50% of the firms took a similar approach for senior employees. Less than one-fifth of the firms opted for a moderate increase in Bonus 2 for both groups. A significant portion of the surveyed firms made no changes to Bonus 2.

Finally, for Bonus 3, over half of the M&A consulting firms opted for a moderate decrease for entry to mid-level employees, while the remaining firms maintained the bonus at the same level. On the other hand, approximately 40% of the firms implemented moderate and/or significant decreases in Bonus 3 for senior employees, while the remaining firms made no changes to the bonus for the same level.

Adjustment to additional benefits (i.e. equity-related pay, allowances, pension plans)

Roughly half of the surveyed firms provide additional benefits, either separately or in combination, primarily for their senior employees. Across all surveyed M&A consulting firms, the adjustments made to equity and additional benefits were minimal in magnitude. This can be attributed, to some extent, to the fact that only a small number of companies included these additional benefits in their offerings to the workforce.

Outlook for 2023: expectations and future changes in compensation

The global M&A business outlook for 2023 remains uncertain due to fears of a global recession and rising interest rates introduced by central banks to curb inflation in many regions. This gloomy perspective is unfortunately maintained when looking at statistical data on 2023 M&A activity so far. A report from the GlobalData Insurance Intelligence Center reveals a significant decline of M&A deals by 44% to USD 413 billion in Q1 2023, down from $744 billion in Q1 2022. The year-end deal volume projected for 2023 is anticipated to reach USD 2,153 billion - a significant decrease of 37% compared to the figure recorded in 2022. This indicated that ensuring well-balanced compensation for the workforce may remain a pressing challenge for M&A consulting firms.

Vencon Research’s survey revealed that just under half of the M&A consulting firms intended to raise base pay for entry, mid-level and senior employees, while the remainder had no plans to adjust base pay at any level.

Despite the financial uncertainty, the majority of firms (over 60%) intended to keep performance-based bonuses (Bonus 1) unchanged in 2023.

As far as firm-based bonuses (Bonus 2), many M&A consulting firms (over 60%) did not provide a response. It appears challenging for them to accurately anticipate their firms’ performance in 2023. Nevertheless, about one-third of firms indicated no intention to make any changes to Bonus 2.

In terms of Bonus 3, which is allocated from an M&A team's bonus pool, few firms (<20%) reported an intention to increase it. However, the rest of the firms intended no changes or found it difficult to provide a definitive answer due to the prevailing uncertainties.

Regarding additional benefits, the majority of firms (over 70%) intended not to make any changes to allowances and pension plans, while the rest faced difficulties in providing a definitive answer. However, a small number of firms (less than 10%) introduced equity-pay, and non-cash benefits (less than 20%) as a new component in their compensation plans, while others either didn't offer these components, mentioned no changes, or didn't respond.

Vencon Research Advisory

Should you or your team seek further guidance on how your firm can adjust, or your competitors have adjusted, compensation strategies amid challenging market conditions, please reach out to us here at Vencon Research. We are, as always, eager to assist you and provide valuable insights.

Disclaimer

Please note that the survey insights are based on the analysis of a carefully chosen group of survey participants. Therefore, while the report may provide valuable insights, it is important to acknowledge that it may not offer a comprehensive representation of all M&A consulting firms. However, the information regarding compensation structures, including the bonus pool, remains highly relevant and can still provide valuable insights for a wide range of M&A consulting firms. 

Sources:

1.       The Institute for Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances (IMAA), https://imaa-institute.org/mergers-and-acquisitions-statistics/

2.       GlobalData Insurance Intelligence Center, https://imaa-institute.org/mergers-and-acquisitions-statistics/

Notes:

[1] Data for 2023 is estimated

[2] Entry to mid-level employees (from Analyst to Manager levels)

[3] Senior employees (from Senior Manager to Partner/Managing Director)

‍

By Gonzalo Lavín Alfaro - Business Development Team

Belgium’s consulting industry is facing severe challenges as a result of the government's policy of annually adjusting wages based on the inflation index.

The Belgian government enacts a wage adjustment policy each January based on an index of inflation for a specific group of employees to ensure they maintain their purchasing power. However, this cost is passed on to firms, resulting in reduced profitability.

Up to now, consulting firms have been able to offset this cost increase with increased productivity. According to one client in the consulting industry, "when salary costs increase by less than 5%, a similar increase in productivity was normally achievable."

However, the required wage adjustment in January 2023 of 11.08% poses a steep challenge. While some firms have attempted to increase their rates and pass on the cost to clients, many clients are unwilling to accept higher rates and are instead requesting discounts or fewer charged days due to the current economic climate.

In response, firms are considering other measures to address these challenges. One idea is to adjust target bonuses, particularly for workers in higher seniority levels. This would help firms manage costs while maintaining competitiveness but still rewarding lower level employees for their performance.  Another more radical idea, albeit not uncommon in the Belgian market already, is to expand the usage of external contractors as consultants, allowing firms to avoid certain types of taxes and giving them more flexibility in managing their workforce. While this approach may have benefits for firms, it could also have implications for workers, such as reduced job security and fewer benefits.

Should you want to discuss the ideas being considered by your competitors or how you may successfully respond to these challenges, please contact Vencon Research – as always, we are happy to assist you.

‍

COVID-19 currently influences all of our lives and its constraints will have continued effects on the consulting industry, especially with regards to communication within firms and with clients and on how work for clients is delivered. Our survey’s results show operational changes are expected, as, for example, “working from home” has become and will continue to be an alternative “modus operandi”. All this is also expected to have a positive impact on the attractiveness of consulting as a job, especially with regards to the work-life-balance of consultants with families. At the same time, none of our survey’s respondents indicated reducing or planning to reduce consultants’ pay.

Starting in early 2020, the COVID-19 crisis has become a drastic influence on our lives. In the light of the potential economic, financial, and other impacts of this world-wide crisis Vencon Research initiated a “Pulse Survey” in September 2020 to gather information on how the consulting industry has reacted to the crisis. We were particularly interested in finding out if the measures taken and implemented by firms also had an effect on job descriptions and on remuneration, especially for client-facing staff. We furthermore wanted to find out whether these changes represented temporary solutions or a “paradigm shift” in how the consulting industry operates.

The key findings of the survey can be summarised as follows:

• Three-quarters of respondents reported “travelling” to have been a “normal” part of the existing job profile of their consultants / client-facing staff.
  ‍
• Meanwhile, all responding firms have largely eliminated the day-to-day travel typically required of their client-facing staff, for example for project delivery.
  ‍
• Many firms have furthermore significantly reduced face-to-face time spent with their clients.
  ‍
• All respondents had invested to ensure their client-facing staff can work efficiently from home.
• -In this respect, client data confidentiality and data security have come to the forefront and may be a matter that requires additional review and improvement.
  ‍
• Most respondents signalled a significant change in how their business was being conducted and delivered. For example:
• -Communication with clients was previously often completed face-to-face and has now been forcedly changed to being conducted primarily via online tools.
• -The delivery of client work would normally be completed on client premises or from the contracted firm’s office. Today instead, consulting work is often organised and completed from the consultant’s “home office”.
  ‍
• Clients seem to accept these changes in how consulting work is delivered.
• -However, during the feedback of the survey results, some clients mentioned that “selling on” into existing projects has become more difficult as a direct result of the lack of “face-to-face” time (i.e. coffee, lunch and dinner time) with key client representatives.
  ‍
• Almost 2/3rds of respondents were additionally considering operational changes, such as a reduction in office space.
• -During feedback discussions with respondents, a potential move of office space to less prominent (and less expensive) areas of the city, due to limited in-house client meetings and the introduction and use of working from home alternatives, was also mentioned.
  ‍
• The measures mentioned above have a radical influence on the work-life-balance generally offered by and associated with the consulting industry, whereby:
• -Close to 60% of respondents expect to see a positive impact on the intrinsic “attractiveness” of the consulting job.
• -Furthermore, more than half of respondents expect to be able to offer a better work-life balance to their client-facing staff, especially due to reduced travel requirements, working from home, etc.
• -They also expect to be able to more successfully hire and retain female consultants and thus anticipate an improved gender-split, especially at the more senior levels.
  ‍
• Most respondents expect these changes to be longer term, i.e. to continue to strongly influence the job of consulting even after the COVID-19 crisis and well into the future.
• -Interestingly, while discussing these results with clients, we also heard another point of view, namely that although reduced travel was seen as an attractive benefit for staff with families (mostly more senior), junior staff (i.e. those without families) actually complained about the lack of travel during COVID times. These anecdotal responses seem to confirm what 15% of respondents stated in the survey: due to the aforementioned changes, the job of consulting will become less attractive, especially for those more junior employees who actually like and prefer the travel aspect of the job.
  ‍
• Although a number of firms experienced a significant reduction in business and have put at least some of their consultants on furlough, none of the participants reported actually reducing remuneration. Neither the base salaries nor targeted bonuses of their client-facing staff were reduced, even when considering a potential change in the consultant job profile (for example due to less travel, more time at home or the like).
• -This result however does not reflect any potential short-term reductions in remuneration e.g. due to an introduction of furlough.
  ‍
• This is partly confirmed by our 2020 salary surveys which continue to show increases in the remuneration offered to consulting staff in many countries. These increases may however result from the timing of salary reviews as most firms had completed and in part already implemented changes in remuneration before the COVID crisis hit their markets.
  ‍
• Although increases in target remuneration were seen, unfortunately most firms will not be in the position to pay out the targeted bonuses in full in 2020 (or at a similar level as for 2019).

Should you have any further questions or would like to receive more detailed information on this topic, please reach out to us at info@venconresearch.com.

Andy Klose is an Associate Partner at Vencon Research International and heads the firm’s consulting unit.

Erwin Harbauer is a Partner at and co-founder of Vencon Research International.

Vencon Research International is a leading provider of compensation benchmarking and research as well as of compensation and performance-related consulting services for professional service firms, especially for audit and tax, management consulting, and IT services firms. Vencon Research International provides services to a full range of clients in more than 75 countries worldwide and is proud to name more than 85% of the world’s major consulting and/or professional services firm its clients.

‍

By Andy Klose - Associate Partner, Head of Advisory

Traditional single-track career and salary models often employ wide salary bands, which can lead to pay compression and employee dissatisfaction. In contrast, multi-track career and salary models offer a clear path for advancement and compensation, fostering motivation and transparency. This article explores the drawbacks of wide salary bands and the benefits of adopting multiple career tracks with defined salary increments.

The Problem with Wide Salary Bands

Wide salary bands within a single-track career model can create significant challenges for organizations and their employees. These bands are typically characterized by overlapping salary ranges that are often wider than the market average.

These wide salary bands can lead to several issues:

1. Pay compression and low pay hygiene: Wide salary bands result in pay compression, when salary increases over time do not adequately reflect differences in responsibilities, role, experience, or performance. This compression can cause high-performing employees to feel underappreciated and undervalued, leading to decreased motivation and loyalty. Moreover, the lack of clear pay hygiene — meaning transparent and fair salary structures — can result in dissatisfaction and disengagement.
2. Confusion and false expectations: The lack of clarity regarding pay increases and promotions often leads to confusion and false expectations. Employees may expect significant pay increases upon promotion, only to be disappointed by minimal adjustments. This can result in frustration and a sense of stagnation, particularly for high-performers who feel their efforts are not adequately recognized.
3. Sense of unfairness and demotivation: Employees may perceive the wide salary bands as unfair, especially if they see colleagues at the same career level (even if roles and performance may be different) earning significantly different salaries. This perception of unfairness can demotivate employees, reducing their productivity and commitment to the organization.
4. Lack of transparency and meritocracy: The single-track model frequently lacks transparency, as the pay grid is not shared with employees. This opacity allows for pay increases to be subject to discretion, leading to end-of-year negotiations that can descend to the level of haggling. Such practices undermine meritocracy, affecting employee motivation and loyalty.

Examples of Single-Track Model Issues

Theoretical potential vs. reality (1): In theory, an employee could move from the bottom of one salary range to the top of the next, a potential increase of approximately 250%. However, in reality, the company may offer just an 8% raise.

Discretion vs. planned pay advancement (2): A high-performer may expect to receive a 15% increase based on experience from previous promotions, while the company may prefer to offer just an 10% raise.

Frustration with pay disparities (3): Employees can become frustrated when they learn that colleagues at the same level are earning significantly more, e.g., with Base Salaries several times higher, especially if there is not much more differentiation than career level (e.g. to understand how roles may differ).

The Benefits of Multiple Career Tracks

In contrast to the single-track model, multi-track career and salary models offer a more structured and transparent approach to compensation. The multi-track model defines specific roles and levels within the organization, each with a set Base Salary or “spot value” along various distinct tracks.

Key advantages of the multi-track career and salary models include:

1. Clear pay development: For each track and level, Base Salary is clearly defined, with increases to the next levels outlined as specific percentages. This clarity creates a straightforward path for employees, allowing them to understand exactly what they need to achieve to advance.
2. Transparency and clarity: The pay grid in a multi-track model is typically transparent, providing employees with a clear understanding of their pay potential. This transparency eliminates confusion and sets realistic expectations for salary development.
3. Reduced need for negotiation: Since the company adheres to a set pay grid, there is little need for negotiation. Variance in compensation is based on KPI achievements and variable bonus pay-outs, which reflect performance differences and motivate high-achievers.
4. Focus on meritocracy: The model based on "spot values" promotes a meritocratic environment, as seen in many leading strategy consulting firms. Employees know what Base Salary to expect at the next career level, shifting their focus to achieving promotions rather than negotiating salaries.

Optimising Career Tracks

The transition from a single-track career and salary model with wide salary bands to a multi-track model with defined salary increments offers numerous benefits for both organizations and employees. By providing clear pathways for advancement and compensation, companies can foster motivation, transparency, and a meritocratic culture that attracts and retains top talent.

The multi-track model addresses the challenges posed by wide salary bands, creating an environment where employees are motivated to excel and achieve their career goals.

We are at your disposal for further questions and suggestions regarding how you optimally design career tracks (and/or remuneration systems) for your company.

‍

Andy Klose is an Associate Partner at Vencon Research International and heads the firm’s consulting unit.

Vencon Research International is a leading provider of compensation benchmarking and research as well as of compensation and performance-related consulting services for professional service firms, especially for audit and tax, management consulting, and IT services firms. Vencon Research International provides services to a full range of clients in more than 75 countries worldwide and is proud to name more than 85% of the world’s major consulting and/or professional services firm its clients.

Disclaimer: The example provided is simplified, and these are not suggestions but ideas. Any real-life application or implementation requires an in-depth analysis of the client’s circumstances, along with a custom-designed solution. Decisions regarding compensation models should be made with careful consideration of the organization’s specific needs and objectives.

‍

by Andy Klose, Associate Partner and Advisory Team Lead

In the dynamic consulting industry, performance metrics and compensation packages for C-Suite executives are invariably a central topic of discussion. Recent debate has raised concerns about the potential short-term focus of these metrics, which may hinder the long-term development of consulting firms.

This article provides an overview of current practices surrounding C-Suite Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and compensation in the consulting industry, while also exploring the evolving notion of stakeholder engagement and the need for a balanced approach. The insights presented here are based on an anonymous survey conducted by Vencon Research International among leading consulting firms.

Aligning Goals for Long-Term Success

Consulting firms adopt diverse approaches to structuring their C-Suite positions. In our survey, fewer than expected firms reported a fully dedicated C-Suite, while many firms implemented structures where their C-Suite members are at least partially involved in project related or client-facing work. Most firms offer between 4 and 5 C-Suite positions, often following a functional breakdown that includes CEO, CFO, COO, CHRO, CTO, and CLO. This breakdown aligns with the traditional focus on key stakeholders such as clients, firms, owners/partners, and employees.

Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Goals

A key concern highlighted by the survey is the potential short-term orientation of C-Suite performance metrics. While most firms maintain a focus on traditional stakeholder groups, only a few have formally incorporated broader societal and environmental goals. It is essential for consulting companies to strike a balance between short-term quantitative goals and long-term qualitative objectives. By doing so, they can achieve sustainable growth and promote the well-being of their stakeholders.

Setting Long-Term Goals

The majority of consulting firms have embraced longer-term goals for their C-Suite, typically spanning a 3-5 years horizon with annual milestones. These goals primarily revolve around achieving growth and improving profit margins. The use of compounding multi-year averages has been suggested as a means to encourage consistent performance and mitigate the impact of short-term fluctuations.

Tailoring Goals for Success

While aligning goals across the C-Suite is common practice at most firms, some firms intentionally differentiate goals for individual members. This approach fosters lively discussions and progress, allowing each function to be managed using the most appropriate and impactful metrics. However, effective cross-management by the CEO is vital in implementing this strategy.

Linking Performance to Compensation

In the consulting industry, the link between goal achievement and C-Suite compensation is strong, with a majority of firms implementing models that correlate the two. Also, most firms apply minimum thresholds that impact compensation, ensuring that executives meet certain performance criteria. However, the quite regular use of caps on variable pay has been debated, with alternative methods suggested to manage performance peaks.

Navigating Challenges

While most firms reported being well or fully aligned with their company's strategic goals, more than half acknowledged challenges in defining a long-term orientation and evaluating progress. To address these issues, Vencon recommends setting clear, measurable, and comparable goals that consider both past performance and future aspirations. Transparency and control in the evaluation process are critical in ensuring fair compensation and encouraging continued growth.

Conclusion

The consulting industry recognizes the importance of balancing short-term performance with long-term development. By implementing effective performance metrics and aligning goals with strategic plans, consulting firms can drive sustainable growth while promoting the well-being of their stakeholders. The deliberate differentiation of goals for C-Suite members and the use of compounding multi-year averages contribute to enhanced performance and discussions. As the industry evolves, a comprehensive and balanced approach to setting KPIs and compensating C-Suite executives will be crucial for long-term success.

We would be happy to assist your company in defining the compensation components for your company’s C-suite, as well as the dimensions and correlations that determine pay-out of compensation (e.g., bonus) based on target achievement. Please contact our Advisory Team for more information.

‍

Discover the challenges facing the consulting industry in 2023, including competition for talent, a tight labor market and increasing salaries in response to rampant inflation. Download our summary report for a concise overview of all 19 points.

‍